Now that the new version of ChatGPT can process images, I asked it to transcribe a 16th century English will for me along with the Latin probate. The image quality wasn't great being one of the literal black and white images from Gloucestershire archives, and the handwriting on the Latin probate is truly appalling.
It did an unexpectedly good job, better than I would expect from most people. Whilst it was familiar with the fact that the spellings wouldn't be standard, it didn't get them all correct, and it consistently, on it's first pass, rendered Coop as Doop. It missed the abbreviation of the name Cooper, but caught others. It couldn't decipher the date of the will, but did make that clear.
It was clear that it was anticipiating for the Latin probate, unsurprising given it's nature and the poor quality of the handwriting. It picked out the pertinent points, but was filling in with incorrect text, and I couldn't get all of it myself.
So whilst it wasn't perfect, and not quite good enough for a reliabbly spelled transcription, it was certainly good enough to get the content, and responsive to corrections to give a better transcript. I would say its certainly good enough to get a first draft for correction, rather than doing the whole thing from scratch. I haven't tried it yet, as I deliberately wanted to see what it made of a hard example, but I suspect the accuracy would be much better with a better quality image and more consistent more modern handwriting, such as you'll get from about 1800 on.
A downside is that the free version is rate limited to a certain number of messages in 3 hours, which I think is 100, but completely certain of that, which is why I've only tried the one image so far.
Incidentally, the Free Space is my transcription, not ChatGPT's. just to show what I gave it.
For some reason the ID/URL field is consistently returning that this doesn;t exist:
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Will_(1597)_and_Probate_(1598)_of_Henry_Cooper_of_Marston_Sicca%2C_Gloucestershire_-_Glos_GDR/R8/1598/50