Thank you for your quick response! Yes, this is the same village currently Cecehov, okres Michalovce that you found in your sources. Csecseho, Ung, Hungary is one of its many historical names.
I propose creating a new subcategory Cecehov, Slovensko with a parent of the existing category okres Michalovce, Slovensko.
Cecehov, Slovensko would hold all profiles for this location including those referencing its historical names. Optionally, add a comment in the new category with its old names and countries. Someone researching a historic name could easily find the category using Search.
A comment like this perhaps:
Čečehov, Slovensko as of 1993
Old Names:
Hungary, Ung County
1773 Csecseho, 1786 Cschecscho, 1808 Csecsahó, Csecsó, Cžečahow, Cžečow, 1863 Csecsahó, 1873–1902 Csecsehó, 1907–1913 Zuhogó
Czechoslovakia
1920– Čečehov
The advantages of this approach are:
1. Better supports research
Official current and historical records belong to Slovakia and are stored in their archives and civil registries. Slovakia is the primary place for researching Cecehov, not Hungary or Czechoslovakia.
2. Simplifies categorization
All profiles for the village are in one category. There is no need to add more subcategories by historic village name in the future.
3. Will not break categorization
The Slovakia categorization hierarchy already exists. Any legacy subcategories in other hierarchies could be referenced in the new subcategory with a link "See also legacy category name".
Note: There is a Csecseho subcategory in the Hungary hierarchy with only one profile in it that came from a one name study. But, other profiles from the study were created in the Zaluzice subcategory in the Slovakia hierarchy. It may have been created in the wrong place. Of course, it is up to you and the Hungary team to decide how to best handle it.
Thanks in advance for considering this approach.
Jeanne Jarzembak (Szymczak-235)